# <!-- METAHEADER
# –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– -->
"*": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wefindx/schema/master/intent/oo-item.yaml"
# <!-- HEADER
# –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– -->
"base:title": "0oo - Critical systems monitoring"
"og:title": "Critical systems monitoring"
"og:description": "The global emergencies, like the pandemic, brings us to think, how to create rapid and appropriate responses to emergencies, while ensuring individual freedoms we enjoy. The dichotomy arises, when we want to create a decentralized system with the resilience guarantees of a more centralized system. This question is closely related to making decentralized systems (e.g., P2P systems), that are as resilient like distributed systems (cloud infrastructures), with centralized monitoring. _The question comes from discussions at Foresight Institute, [HiveMind workshop](https://foresight.org/hive-mind/)._"
"og:image": "https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/28134655"
"og:url": "/intent/1280/"
"base:css": "/static/css/bootstrap.min.9c25540d6272.css"
"base:extra-css": "/static/css/base.57997aeac1df.css"
"base:favicon": "/static/favicon.acaa334f0136.ico"
"base:body_class": ""
"layout:logo": "/static/0oo.8d2a8bbef612.svg"
"layout:index": "/"
"layout:menu": "/menu/"
"layout:categories": "/intents/"
"layout:ideas": "/methods/"
"layout:projects": "/projects/"
"layout:users": "/users/"
"layout:about": "/about/"
"layout:help": "/help/"
"layout:bug_report": "https://github.com/wefindx/0oo"
"layout:login": "/accounts/login/"
"layout:light-off": "/darken/?darken=true"
"layout:set-multilingual": "/mulang/?mulang=true"
"layout:lang": "Kalba"
"layout:set-language-post-action": "/i18n/setlang/"
"layout:csrf-token": "KQo7Lzw0yhj8aMRBhFzRckZwZggJjRLx9IAMCiHPJ035kQCULVkO7OG5YLgUPppT"
"layout:input-next": "/intent/1280/"
"layout:languages": [{"code": "ja", "is-active": "false", "name": "日本語"}, {"code": "lt", "is-active": "true", "name": "Lietuviškai"}, {"code": "zh-hans", "is-active": "false", "name": "简体中文"}, {"code": "en", "is-active": "false", "name": "English"}, {"code": "ru", "is-active": "false", "name": "Русский"}, {"code": "oo", "is-active": "false", "name": "O;o,"}]
# <!-- TOPIC
# –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– -->
"item:parent:intents": [{"title": "Reshape Global Governance To Address Global Catastrophic Risks", "url": "/intent/783/"}, {"title": "Information Control", "url": "/intent/1248/"}, {"title": "Egzistencinė rizika", "url": "/intent/1114/"}]
"item:title": "Critical systems monitoring"
"item:votes": 0
"item:add-vote": "#addnote"
"item:intent": "/intent/1280/?l=lt"
"item:base-administration": false
"item:body": |
    The global emergencies, like the pandemic, brings us to think, how to create rapid and appropriate responses to emergencies, while ensuring individual freedoms we enjoy. The dichotomy arises, when we want to create a decentralized system with the resilience guarantees of a more centralized system. 
    
    This question is closely related to making decentralized systems (e.g., P2P systems), that are as resilient like distributed systems (cloud infrastructures), with centralized monitoring.
    
    _The question comes from discussions at Foresight Institute, [HiveMind workshop](https://foresight.org/hive-mind/)._
"item:permalink": "/intent/1280/?l=lt"
"item:source-date": ""
"item:owner": "Mindey"
"item:ownerlink": "/user/147/Mindey"
"item:created": "2020-05-13T09:54:33.859000"
"item:intent:child:add": "/admin/hlog/intent/add/?parent=1280"
# <!-- LINKS
# –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– -->
"item:method:items":
"item:method:add": "/admin/hlog/method/add/?parent=1280"
"item:comment:add": "/intents/addnote?parent=1280"
"item:comment:add:csrf_token": "KQo7Lzw0yhj8aMRBhFzRckZwZggJjRLx9IAMCiHPJ035kQCULVkO7OG5YLgUPppT"
"item:comment:form": |
    <li> <textarea name="text" cols="40" rows="10" id="addnote" class="comment-textarea" required>
    </textarea></li>
    <li><label for="id_vote">Balsas:</label> <select name="vote" id="id_vote">
      <option value="-1">[−]</option>
      <option value="0" selected>-</option>
      <option value="1">[+]</option>
    </select></li>
    <li><label for="id_crawl">Tyliai:</label> <input type="checkbox" name="crawl" onchange="handleSilently(this)" id="id_crawl"></li>
    <li><label for="id_has_questions">Siekių:</label> <input type="checkbox" name="has_questions" id="id_has_questions"> <span class="helptext">Pažymėkite, jei komentaras kelia naujų klausimų.</span></li>
    <li><label for="id_has_ideas">Idėjų:</label> <input type="checkbox" name="has_ideas" id="id_has_ideas"> <span class="helptext">Pažymėkite, jei komentaras siųlo galimus sprendimus.</span></li>
    <li><label for="id_has_facts">Faktų:</label> <input type="checkbox" name="has_facts" id="id_has_facts"> <span class="helptext">Pažymėkite, jei komentaras pateikia potencialiai naudingų faktų.</span></li>
    <a href="/accounts/login/">Prašome <u>prisijungti</u>.</a>
# <!-- COMMENTS
# –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– -->
"item:comment:items":
  - "id": "r-83"
    "mtrans": |

        Šios problemos sprendimo pavyzdžių galima rasti gamtoje, t. Y., Kaip avilys reaguoja į įsibrovėlių vapsvą, palyginti su tuo, kaip neatrodo, kad uodai ** ** reaguoja kolektyviai, kiekvienas veikdamas kaip nepriklausomas veikėjas. Skruzdėlynas gali būti kažkas tarp uodo ir avilio tuo, kad kiekviena skruzdėlė veikia savo laisve, vykdydama tam tikrą socialinį vaidmenį, kad ji yra diferenciacijos dalis, panaši į seksualinę diferenciaciją, ir reaguoja į įsibrovėlį panašiai. imuninė sistema reaguoja į patogenus - signalizuoja tam tikros rūšies sukėlėjus (kario skruzdėles ar T-ląsteles). Mes pastebime, kad dabartinėje mūsų visuomenėje žmonės, atliekantys vaidmenis - gydytojai, policininkai ir kt., susiduria su tam tikros rūšies grėsmėmis.
        
        
        
        Įdomu tai, kad visos šios sistemos priklauso nuo tam tikro tipo atpažinimo įrenginių ir signalizacijos. Skruzdėlė atpažįsta tokius signalus kaip feromonai, o mūsų visuomenėje galbūt mes atpažįstame skirtingus signalus. Aš manau, kad dalis sprendimo slypi kuriant socialinių signalų abėcėlę ir diegiant naujoves aplink socialinius vaidmenis. Pvz., Mums gali prireikti signalo (arba simbolio) ir atsirandančių eksponentinių augimų atpažinimo priemonės.
        
        
        
        Konkrečios tokių simbolių rinkinių ir signalų modelių idėjos gali būti įdomios ir būti siūlomos kaip idėjos.

    "text": |
        Examples of solutions to this problem could be found in nature, i.e., how a beehive responds to an intruder wasp, vs., how mosquitoes **do not** seem to respond collectively, each acting as an independent actor. An ant-hill may be something between a mosquito and a beehive, in that every ant acts with its own freedom, in fulfilling some social role, that it takes as part of differentiation, similar to sexual differentiation, and respond to intruders a bit like the immune system responds to pathogens -- signaling to certain type of agents (warrior ants, or T-cells, and we find people in our current societies that roles -- doctors, policemen, etc.) to engage with certain type of threats.
        
        What's interesting, is that all these systems rely on certain type of recognizers, and signaling. An ant recognizes signals like pheromones, while in our society, we may be recognizing different kind of signals. I'd think part of the solution lies in developing an alphabet for social signals, and innovating around social roles. For example, we may need a signal (or a symbol) and a recognizer of emergent exponential growths. 
        
        The particular ideas of such symbol sets  and signaling patterns may be interesting, and be suggested as ideas.
    "owner": "Mindey"
    "ownerlink": "/user/147/Mindey"
    "permalink": "/intent/1280/?l=lt#r-83"
    "created": "2020-05-13T09:54:47.494000"
    "vote": ""
"base:js": "/static/js/base.c7357c06cc89.js"